i wasn't always a scientist, per se, but have always been interested in making things as a child, i met someone who taught me to think as a scientist he too thought less of life than of progress, so our relationship did not last, but those early teachings planted the seed - morally as well as vocationally, i suppose.
then our definitions are not so dissimilar. curiosity, a hunger for knowledge, for discovery - these are the fundamentals. those empirical methods are simply the means to exercise our passions - to direct them, to refine the results, to enable legitimate proof. i would argue that a scientist may contribute to the greater pool of knowledge with models alone - someone, somewhere, somewhen, will find that knowledge interesting, inspiring, perhaps even useful - unless you mean the other kind of artistic model. anatomical study is valid science.
[Is he joking? Maybe.
After a delay,]
it has been roughly seven years since we met.
Edited (someone was wrong on the internet and it was me) Date: 2022-08-02 07:24 pm (UTC)
at their best the arts and sciences are nearly the same just differing in their products models are quite a contribution anatomical study is an excellent example of the overlap
[ Balthier's done his share of figure study. It's soothing. ]
yes well leave it to humes to fight where they could work together I'm impressed you've retained your optimism and strength of belief
[ He chuckles at the question. He'd attempted to mark it, but Fran hadn't cared much, and they'd done what they usually did: slayed monsters, robbed a tomb. ]
We're more the celebrate every day sort of partnership.
oh really i seem to recall someone coming perilously close to scolding me for being enmeshed in work just minutes ago was that you or some other pirate
clearly you spend too much time in your lab if the behavior of regular people is surprising to you but I wont' chastise you because I think I'm jealous of your blissful ignorance it is indeed great fun to watch people try to tell Fran this. I think she's cracked a few spirits with her gaze alone.
no subject
Date: 2022-07-25 02:53 pm (UTC)yes, well
as a scientist i have no choice but to operate on principles
:)
no subject
Date: 2022-07-25 06:08 pm (UTC)Has it always been science for you? Or did something tip you in?
no subject
Date: 2022-07-25 06:27 pm (UTC)as a child, i met someone who taught me to think as a scientist
he too thought less of life than of progress, so our relationship did not last, but those early teachings planted the seed -
morally as well as vocationally, i suppose.
now i build things to raise a city up.
no subject
Date: 2022-07-26 03:54 pm (UTC)I can respect that
some heroic daftness in there too, trying to do it yourself
I can relate to that too
no subject
Date: 2022-07-30 04:47 am (UTC)what is your definition of a scientist?
no subject
Date: 2022-08-02 06:39 pm (UTC)a person who seeks to understand the world by empirical questioning, observation, and testing -- through physical tests, not artistic models
no subject
Date: 2022-08-02 07:15 pm (UTC)curiosity, a hunger for knowledge, for discovery - these are the fundamentals.
those empirical methods are simply the means to exercise our passions - to direct them, to refine the results, to enable legitimate proof.
i would argue that a scientist may contribute to the greater pool of knowledge with models alone - someone, somewhere, somewhen, will find that knowledge interesting, inspiring, perhaps even useful -
unless you mean the other kind of artistic model.
anatomical study is valid science.
[Is he joking? Maybe.
After a delay,]
it has been roughly seven years since we met.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-02 10:04 pm (UTC)just differing in their products
models are quite a contribution
anatomical study is an excellent example of the overlap
[ Balthier's done his share of figure study. It's soothing. ]
Little past a decade for us
no subject
Date: 2022-08-02 10:18 pm (UTC)therein lies great synergistic potential -
a partnership.
did you celebrate your ten year mark?
no subject
Date: 2022-08-02 10:49 pm (UTC)I'm impressed you've retained your optimism and strength of belief
[ He chuckles at the question. He'd attempted to mark it, but Fran hadn't cared much, and they'd done what they usually did: slayed monsters, robbed a tomb. ]
We're more the celebrate every day sort of partnership.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-02 11:09 pm (UTC)through your work?
i am very much in favour of that.
[And always forgetting anniversaries, which he is not about to volunteer.]
no subject
Date: 2022-08-03 12:06 am (UTC)it's been a good system
[ Is he starting to feel that he's aging and she isn't? Yes. He's aware they're going to have to start dealing with that this decade. ]
no subject
Date: 2022-08-03 12:39 am (UTC)i seem to recall someone coming perilously close to scolding me for being enmeshed in work just minutes ago
was that you or some other pirate
no subject
Date: 2022-08-03 11:43 pm (UTC)I'm afraid you've got me there.
Though maybe I should clarify she's my work partner.
I like to take long vacations and long baths.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 07:37 am (UTC)[Staring for a moment, thumb tapping,]
but you needn't clarify.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 04:12 pm (UTC)You'd be surprised how many people argue with me over that fact.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 04:38 pm (UTC)how unusually presumptuous.
i would definitely enjoy watching someone argue that point with mine.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 04:44 pm (UTC)but I wont' chastise you because I think I'm jealous of your blissful ignorance
it is indeed great fun to watch people try to tell Fran this. I think she's cracked a few spirits with her gaze alone.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 05:07 pm (UTC)["a wizard arrives precisely when he means to"]
but yes - she does have the look for it
like a steel edge
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 05:17 pm (UTC)She has an impressive high kick, too.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 05:31 pm (UTC)my partner does not.
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 05:55 pm (UTC)[ He has tried. ]
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 06:39 pm (UTC)long ears might suit you, however.
[After this message, he will not respond for at least ninety minutes. Will he indicate this in advance? Of course not.]
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 07:05 pm (UTC)perish the thought they'd ruin my silhouette
[ Not that he wouldn't adapt fashion is just artistic theory applied and he's excellent at color and shape.
The gap in time doesn't bother him. Honestly he's surprised he got so much undivided attention for as long as he did. ]
no subject
Date: 2022-08-04 07:24 pm (UTC)Ninety-six minutes later,]
did you drop this
[Attached is a snap of a random earring lying on the sidewalk.]
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: